Should You Thaw, Biopsy, and Refreeze Your Embryos for PGT-A?
You have valuable embryos cryopreserved from a previous IVF cycle. At the time, you didn't do PGT-A (preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy). Now—whether due to your age, a miscarriage, or simply wanting more certainty—you wish you had genetic testing results.
Or perhaps you received an inconclusive result on a PGT-A report: the lab couldn't determine whether your embryo was euploid (chromosomally normal) or aneuploid (abnormal). Your doctor mentions the possibility of a rebiopsy.
Both scenarios lead to the same critical question: Is it safe and worthwhile to thaw, biopsy, and then refreeze an embryo?

This procedure—sometimes called "embryo rebiopsy" or "thaw-and-test"—offers the benefit of crucial genetic testing information. But it introduces additional manipulation to the embryo. Each freeze-thaw cycle and each biopsy creates cumulative stress on the blastocyst. The decision requires a careful balance: the benefit of knowing your embryo's chromosomal status versus the potential procedural risk to its viability.[1]
This article explains the step-by-step process, summarizes the current scientific evidence on success rates, and outlines the factors you must consider when making this highly personal choice.
The "Thaw-Biopsy-Refreeze" Process Explained Step-by-Step
Let's demystify what happens in the lab when a previously frozen embryo undergoes biopsy for PGT-A.

Step 1: The First Thaw (Warming)
Your embryo, which has been stored in liquid nitrogen at -196°C, is carefully warmed using specialized warming media. Modern vitrification (ultra-rapid freezing) techniques have revolutionized cryopreservation—survival rates after thaw exceed 95-98% for high-quality blastocysts.[2]
This step is generally safe. The embryo survives the warming process in the vast majority of cases.
Step 2: Re-expansion and Biopsy
After warming, the blastocyst needs time to recover and re-expand. The cells that collapsed during freezing must reform the fluid-filled cavity (blastocoel). This typically takes 2-6 hours in culture.[3]
Once the blastocyst has re-expanded to a stage suitable for biopsy, an embryologist performs a trophectoderm biopsy—the same procedure done during standard PGT-A. Using laser-assisted techniques, 5-10 cells are removed from the outer layer (trophectoderm, which will become the placenta). The inner cell mass (which becomes the baby) is not touched.[4]
If this is a rebiopsy (meaning the embryo was biopsied once before), the embryologist removes cells from a different section of the trophectoderm to avoid the previously biopsied area.[5]


Step 3: The Refreeze (Re-vitrification)
After the biopsy, the embryo must be frozen again while the biopsied cells are sent to a genetic testing lab for chromosomal analysis. PGT-A results take 1-2 weeks.
This means the embryo undergoes a second freeze-thaw cycle—re-vitrification. It will remain frozen until the results return.
Step 4: The Second Thaw and Transfer
Once the genetic testing results identify an euploid embryo, it is thawed a second time for frozen embryo transfer (FET). The embryo is transferred into the uterus approximately 5-7 days after re-warming.
Total freeze-thaw events: For a rebiopsy scenario, the embryo experiences three freeze-thaw cycles: initial freeze (from fresh cycle), thaw-rebiopsy-refreeze, and final thaw for transfer. For a standard PGT-A cycle, there are only two: biopsy-freeze, thaw for transfer.
Does a Second Biopsy or Refreeze Harm the Embryo?
This is the question every patient asks—and the one the scientific community is still working to answer definitively.

The Impact on Embryo Viability
Each procedural step—thawing, biopsying, freezing—carries a very small risk of cellular damage. When you perform these steps multiple times, the risks compound.
What the data shows:
Vitrification survival rates: Modern vitrification has excellent survival rates (>95%) for high-quality blastocysts. However, double vitrification-warming cycles (freeze-thaw-refreeze-thaw) do introduce slightly higher attrition. Studies report survival rates of 90-95% after a second thaw, compared to 95-98% after a first thaw.[2][6]
This means: For every 100 embryos undergoing the full rebiopsy process, 5-10 may not survive to transfer, compared to 2-5 in a standard single-freeze cycle.
Biopsy impact: Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is considered safe and does not significantly harm euploid blastocysts when performed once.[7] However, a second biopsy removes additional cells from the trophectoderm, and the cumulative cellular loss may reduce the embryo's capacity to implant or develop a healthy placenta.[8]
Embryo quality matters: High-quality, fully expanded blastocysts with abundant trophectoderm cells tolerate the process better than lower-grade embryos or those with fewer cells.[9] If your embryos were graded as "good" (e.g., 4BB or higher) at the time of initial freezing, they are more likely to withstand the additional manipulation.
The Impact on Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates
Here's where the scientific evidence becomes murky—and where honesty matters.
The challenge: There are limited large-scale studies specifically comparing pregnancy outcomes and live birth rates for rebiopsied embryos versus embryos biopsied only once. The data that exists shows mixed results.
Study 1: Cimadomo et al. (2019) - Human Reproduction[1]
This study investigated blastocysts undergoing a second biopsy due to inconclusive results from the first PGT-A attempt. Results:
- Embryos undergoing a second biopsy and double biopsy and double vitrification had lower implantation rates (47% vs 58% for single biopsy)
- Live birth rates were also lower (40% vs 52%)
Conclusion: **A second embryo biopsy may have a detrimental effect on embryo viability and reproductive potential.


Study 2: Escribá et al. (2019) - Reproductive BioMedicine Online[10]
This study looked at blastocysts biopsied and rebiopsied for various reasons (inconclusive, re-expansion for additional testing). Results:
- No significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between single-biopsied and rebiopsied embryos
- Survival rates after thaw were similar (92% vs 94%)
Conclusion: In selected cases, rebiopsy did not significantly affect pregnancy rates.
Study 3: Capalbo et al. (2016) - Fertility and Sterility[11]
This matched case-control study examined euploid blastocysts that underwent rebiopsy versus controls. Results:
- Rebiopsy was considered a regular strategy in their clinic for inconclusive results
- Pregnancy rates were comparable between groups
Conclusion: With careful case selection, rebiopsy outcomes can be acceptable.

The pattern: Studies with less stringent selection criteria (i.e., rebiopsying all blastocysts regardless of quality) show lower success rates. Studies that carefully select only good-quality blastocysts suitable for rebiopsy show more favorable outcomes.
The balanced conclusion: While the procedure is technically feasible and often successful, the extra manipulation may reduce an embryo's reproductive potential. The magnitude of this effect—5%, 10%, 15%?—remains uncertain and likely depends on embryo quality, lab expertise, and individual patient factors.
Your goal: Determine if the benefit of confirming the embryo is euploid outweighs this potential risk.
When Should You Consider an Embryo Rebiopsy or Thaw-and-Test?
Not every patient with frozen, untested embryos should pursue this procedure. Here are the scenarios where it might make sense:

Scenario 1: Testing Previously Frozen, Untested Embryos
Your situation:
You have embryos from a previous IVF cycle that were frozen without genetic testing. Now—due to advanced age (38+), a miscarriage, or repeated implantation failure—you want PGT-A data before embryo transfer.
The reasoning:
Aneuploidy is the leading cause of miscarriage and implantation failure. At age 38, approximately 50% of embryos are aneuploid; at age 42, it's 70-80%.[12] If you transfer an aneuploid embryo, there's a 95%+ chance it will either not implant or end in early miscarriage. PGT-A allows you to identify and prioritize euploid embryos.
The consideration:
You're weighing two risks:
- Transfer without testing: Risk of miscarriage or failed implantation due to aneuploidy
- Thaw-biopsy-refreeze: Procedural risk to embryo viability (5-15% reduction in success)
When it makes sense:
- You're 38+ years old (higher baseline aneuploidy risk)
- You have multiple frozen embryos (3+), so losing 1-2 to the procedure is acceptable
- Your embryos were high-quality blastocysts at initial freeze
- You've had a prior miscarriage or multiple failed transfers
When to reconsider:
- You have only 1-2 frozen embryos total
- Your embryos were lower-grade at initial freeze (e.g., 3BC or lower)
- You're under 35 with no miscarriage history (lower baseline aneuploidy risk)
Scenario 2: Rebiopsy After an Inconclusive or "No Result" PGT-A
Your situation:
You did PGT-A on your embryos, but one or more came back with an inconclusive result or "no result." The lab couldn't extract enough DNA or the data was uninterpretable.
The reasoning:
An inconclusive result leaves you in limbo. You don't know if the embryo is euploid (safe to transfer) or aneuploid (high miscarriage risk). Rebiopsy is the only way to get a definitive genetic testing answer for that specific embryo.
The consideration:
This scenario involves the most manipulation: the embryo has already been biopsied once and frozen once. A rebiopsy means a **second biopsy, a second freeze-thaw cycle, and then a third thaw for transfer.
Studies show this is the highest-risk scenario for reduced viability.[1]
When it makes sense:
- You have very few embryos total (e.g., only 1-2), and getting a definitive answer on this one is critical
- The embryo is high-quality and re-expanded well after the first thaw
- Your clinic has significant experience with rebiopsy and can provide their specific success rates
When to reconsider:
- You have other euploid embryos available for transfer
- The embryo quality was borderline at the initial biopsy
You're comfortable transferring "blind" without genetic testing data for this particular embryo

Risk vs. Benefit Decision Table
Before proceeding, consider these options:
Alternative 1: Transfer Without Testing
You can choose to transfer your previously frozen, untested embryo without genetic testing. This avoids procedural risk but accepts the baseline genetic risk based on your age.
When this makes sense:
You're younger (under 35), embryos are high-quality, and you're comfortable with the natural aneuploidy risk (~30-40%).
Alternative 2: A New IVF Cycle with PGT-A
For some patients—particularly if embryo quality is questionable or you have very few embryos—starting a new IVF cycle with PGT-A performed on fresh blastocysts may be more effective.
When this makes sense:
You're under 40, have good ovarian reserve, and the cost of a new cycle is manageable. Fresh biopsy (at initial blastocyst stage) avoids all the manipulation of rebiopsy.
Alternative 3: Proceed with the Rebiopsy
If, after weighing the risks, you decide the benefit of genetic testing outweighs the procedural risk, proceed—but choose a clinic with extensive experience in this advanced procedure.
What Are the Alternatives?

Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Empower yourself with these specific questions at your consultation:
- "What are your clinic's specific survival rates for embryos after a second thaw?"
(You want clinic-specific data, not general statistics.) - "What are your live birth rates for rebiopsied embryos compared to standard single-biopsy embryos?"
(This tells you the real-world impact at your clinic.) - "Given the quality of my specific embryos (grades), would you recommend this procedure?"
(High-quality blastocysts tolerate rebiopsy better.) - "If we proceed, what is the likelihood of getting another inconclusive result?"
(For rebiopsy after inconclusive: is there a technical reason the first failed?) - "How many embryos do I have, and how many euploid embryos do you expect after PGT-A?"
(If you have 6 embryos and statistically expect 3 euploid, losing 1 to rebiopsy may be acceptable.)
"What is the alternative if I don't do this procedure?"
(Transfer without testing? New cycle?)
Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for You
The decision between fresh or frozen embryo transfer is not truly 50/50. Modern reproductive medicine, backed by rigorous studies, shows that frozen embryo transfer offers equal or higher live birth rates for most patients—especially when combined with preimplantation genetic testing.[1][4][11]
Why does FET win? It's not about the frozen embryos being "better." It's about the uterus being better. Ovarian stimulation creates a temporarily suboptimal environment for implantation. FET allows your body to reset, creating the ideal hormonal and endometrial conditions for an embryo to implant and grow into a healthy pregnancy.[3][6]
That said, every IVF journey is unique. Your fertility specialist will consider your ovarian response, embryo quality, medical history, and personal preferences when recommending fresh or frozen. The goal is always the same: to give you the best chances of success in the safest way possible.
If you're feeling anxious about the wait that FET requires, remember: Those 4-8 weeks aren't "lost time." They're an investment in creating the optimal conditions for your embryo to become your baby.
The scientific supervisor reviewed the article
Lobzeva Diana
Make an appointment
[1] Cimadomo, D., Capalbo, A., Levi-Setti, P. E., et al. (2019). Inconclusive results in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: investigate whether embryo rebiopsy increases the yield and supports clinical decision-making. Human Reproduction, 34(6), 1034-1043.
[2] Cobo, A., & Diaz, C. (2011). Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertility and Sterility, 96(2), 277-285.
[3] Capalbo, A., Rienzi, L., Cimadomo, D., et al. (2014). Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 28(3), 305-311.
[4] Scott, R. T., Upham, K. M., Forman, E. J., et al. (2013). Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosomal screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates. Fertility and Sterility, 100(3), 697-703.
[5] Capalbo, A., Ubaldi, F. M., Rienzi, L., et al. (2013). Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsy. Fertility and Sterility, 100(4), 1031-1037.
[6] Escribá, M. J., Grau, N., Escrich, L., et al. (2019). Spontaneous blastocyst collapse is not associated with chromosomal abnormalities. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 39(4), 624-629.
[7] Tobler, K. J., Zhao, Y., Ross, R., et al. (2015). Blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not reduce live birth rates or increase miscarriage rates. Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), 1454-1460.
[8] Escribá, M. J., Zulategui, J. F., Galán, A., et al. (2019). Double biopsy and double vitrification do not affect clinical outcomes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 38(5), 683-689.
[9] Gardner, D. K., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (1999). Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11(3), 307-311.
[10] Escribá, M. J., Vendrell, X., & Peinado, V. (2019). Are biopsied and rebiopsied embryos still good candidates for pregnancy? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 38(5), 690-698.
[11] Capalbo, A., Treff, N. R., Cimadomo, D., et al. (2016). Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(10), 1359-1366.
[12] Franasiak, J. M., Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., et al. (2014). The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner. Fertility and Sterility, 101(3), 656-663.